Buildings and Grounds Committee

June 10, 2008 – 7:30 a.m.

DRAFT Minutes

 

Present:                   Chad Loomis, Chairman; Gene Waldbauer; Tom Williams; Tony Piombo; Don Spaulding; Newell Willcox; Tom Harnett

Others Present:       Scott Schrader, County Administrator; Ann Homer, Secretary II; Carol Deloff, Area Agency on Aging; Sandy Price, Majority Leader; Jane Goldner; Dave Hartnett, DA; John Troy, Legislator, LD 1; Mark Suben, County Attorney; Danny Ross, Minority Leader; Maxine Ripley, Court System; Brian Parker, Buildings and Grounds Supervisor; Russ Oeschle, Court System; Carol Tytler, Legislator, LD 3; Eric Mulvihill, WHXC; Evan Geibel, Cortland Standard.

Mr. Loomis called the meeting to order at 7:32 a.m.

Mr. Williams moved adoption of the May 6, 2008, minutes of the regular meeting with the correction that the meeting was called to order at 7:30 a.m. rather than 8:30 as printed. Seconded by Mr. Willcox. All members voting in favor, none opposed; minutes approved as amended.

Mr. Williams moved adoption of the May 22, 2008, minutes of the special meeting as printed. Seconded by Mr. Willcox. All members voting in favor, none opposed; minutes approved as printed.

Resolutions

Information Technology

1.         Authorize Amendment Information Technology (Lexis-Nexis). Mr. Willcox moved adoption; seconded by Mr. Spaulding. Mr. Loomis asked what Lexis-Nexis is. Mr. Schrader indicated that it is legal on-line research software. All the attorneys have access to the system as well as Mr. Schrader. The subscription is now up for a two-year renewal. Mr. Willcox asked if it  is really necessary. Mr. Schrader indicated that it is necessary and it is actually cost saving, as it eliminates the need for hard bound books for all the attorneys in the County. All members voting in favor, none opposed; resolution approved.

Discussions/Presentations

1.         Mr. Parker demonstrated, per the committee’s request, the crow machine that the County has purchased. Mr. Parker indicated that it is going to the YWCA in the near future. Mr. Parker indicated that it will operate 4 to 6 hours on a timer.

2.         Joe Maryak from the company completing the re-vamping of the Court system space and the Courthouse gave an update to the committee. The Court System is nearly finished, the next step is to move in to the current area of the DA’s office and to revamp the first floor of the Courthouse so that the DA’s office can be integrated. Plans are moving along successfully as scheduled. Mr. Parker indicated that the “upstairs” space at the Courthouse needs to be vacated by June 23 so that the next phase can commence. Mr. Tom Hartnett asked Mr. Dave Hartnett if he still had concerns about the space and the proposed plan. Mr. D. Hartnett outlined the current use of space by his office in the Courthouse. Mr. D. Hartnett has walked through the first floor space with Mr. Parker. He still has a concern about the confidential witnesses walking through the public spaces in order to get to the Grand Jury room. He gave a specific example of a case that took place last week with a confidential witness in and out of the Courtroom three times. He is concerned about the proposed use of space and the fact that if the case he referenced took place in the new space, he would have his confidential witness walking through public space three times. He is also concerned if he has a sexual abuse case and having to have the victim be “paraded” through the public space. Mr. Williams asked how witnesses find the DA’s office under the current system. Mr. D. Hartnett responded that individuals do have to walk through the public area to get to his office on the third floor. Mr. D. Hartnett responded that there is no way to get a confidential witness to his office under the cloak of complete security under the current system. However, once the witness reaches his office, the confidentiality is maintained, as there is an internal stairway that is not open to the public, which is used to transfer the witnesses. Mr. D. Hartnett is concerned that there will not be that confidential stairway or other means to maintain confidentiality of witnesses. Mr. D. Hartnett expressed his concern about the small amount of square footage available to the DA’s office. Mr. Maryak did offer that there will be a couple of offices available in the space previously occupied by the County Clerk on the first floor that could potentially be used as a Grand Jury room. Mr. D. Hartnett responded that that would be a better solution than having the Grand Jury room on the third floor and his offices on the first floor. Mr. D. Hartnett re-expressed his concern for the Grand Jury room and for any sitting Grand Jury. He is also concerned that there will be no restroom facilities available for witnesses. Mr. Williams asked how frequently there are confidential witnesses/informants. Mr. D. Hartnett indicated that it is basically an on-going situation due to the nature of Grand Jury proceedings and the number of drug and sex cases that we try in this County. Mr. Waldbauer asked if everyone agrees that Mr. D. Hartnett needs the confidential passageway. Mr. Schrader asked if this discussion could wait until there is an opportunity for the parties involved to sit down and actually design the space before any decisions are made. Mr. Oeschle indicated that the Grand Jury is supervised and charged by the Court. The entire process of Grand Jury is a Court proceeding. Mr. Oeschle indicated that the concerns of the DA should be respected and consideration should be taken regarding his concern about the confidentiality for Grand Jury proceedings and witnesses/victims. Mr. Oeschle indicated that he, representing the Court, has no disagreement in principal with the Grand Jury room being located on the first floor. Mr. Oeschle indicated that the Court system needs to be involved in the decisions regarding space for the Grand Jury room. Mr. D. Hartnett indicated that a majority of the contact between the Grand Jury is with the DA’s office, NOT with the Court System. Mr. Waldbauer asked why we talk about this every month, particularly since the space hasn’t been designed. Mr. Schrader agreed with the comment. Mr. Schrader indicated that until we put pen to paper, this discussion is immaterial. Mr. D. Hartnett will be meeting with the architect today so that Mr. D. Hartnett can indicate what he wants. Mr. Waldbauer asked if that means that next month we will find out if Mr. D. Hartnett agrees with the architect. The response was “yes”. Mr. Schrader indicated that the ultimate decision on the use of this space is the Legislature. Mr. Spaulding indicated that if Mr. D. Hartnett agrees with the plan, there shouldn’t be an issue. Mr. Schrader meets with the architect after each meeting with a department head. If there is disagreement, Mr. Schrader will include Mr. Loomis and Mr. Daniels in the discussion.

            Mr. Oeschle indicated that the project completed on the third floor is a beautiful job. He indicated that Ms. Maxine Ripley is available for guided tours of the space if the Legislators are interested. Please contact her to schedule a tour. Mr. Williams asked if this committee could meet at the Courthouse next month and both see the space and see if there is a resolution to Mr. Harnett’s space concern. The committee could meet in the new courtroom. Mr. Schrader will orchestrate this happening for the meeting on July 8 at 7:30 a.m. in the new Courtroom in the Courthouse.

3.         Mr. Maryak spoke about the DMV. He presented a drawing to demonstrate where we are on the project. They have looked at combining the DMV with the Elections Office. With the new guidelines for the storage of the new voting equipment, elections need over 2,500 square feet. DMV needs around 4,000 square feet. Therefore, they are looking at designing a 7,500 square foot building instead of a 6,000 square foot building. The projected parking spaces are approximately 75. Mr. Williams asked if these spaces will be segregated. Mr. Maryak indicated that the spaces could be segregated, however, consideration needs to be taken about snowplowing and clearing. Mr. Schrader indicated that the company that is currently plowing the parking lot will plow the County-owned parking spaces for free. The building on the diagram is shown at a project 7,500 square feet. Mr. Schrader indicated that he has a problem with the 50 feet setback the City is requiring for the building, but he will discuss that with the City. Mrs. Tytler asked if there will be a basement. Mr. Maryak responded that this will be on a concrete slab. He also indicated that there must be a loading dock in the building for the Elections Office.  Mr. Williams asked about the storage of the voting machines – is the rack system still being considered? Mr. Maryak indicated that the voting machines themselves can be stacked, but remember there is additional equipment to be attached to the voting machine to provide a “booth” and to provide an actual ballot box. He also indicated that the papers that will be used for scanning for the ballot need to be maintained for a specific period of time. This storage space is included in the prospective plan. Mrs. Tytler asked if it is feasible to look at the AAA situation on South Main Street and could the machines be stored in the basement of that facility. Mr. Maryak indicated that it is feasible. Mrs. Tytler is concerned about using prime, first floor space for storage. Mr. Williams asked if there are storage considerations for the voting machines. The response was yes that there are temperature concerns, etc. Mr. Loomis asked Mr. Maryak where he felt the best location for storage of the voting machines is. Mr. Maryak indicated that he feels the machines should best be located with the Elections Office. Mr. Loomis asked what the next step is on DMV/Elections. Mr. Maryak indicated that if we go to the next step with the project, it is to actually design the space and meet with the departments involved (DMV, Elections). If both departments are included, it needs to be 7,500 square feet. If it is DMV only, then the building can be smaller. The County does own enough property to include both departments and to provide more than adequate parking. Mr. Spaulding stated that he feels that the committee needs to make a decision as to what departments are going to occupy the River Street building. Mr. Loomis asked how Elections moving out of the COB affects the master plan for the COB. Mr. Maryak indicated that it would free up valuable space. Mr. Willcox indicated that he is aware of a party that is interested in the Moose property that the County owns. He asked if it would be prudent to put a price on the building that would satisfy the taxpayers and provide the County some cash. Mrs. Price indicated that she feels we should hear the remainder of Mr. Maryak’s report and then could better make a decision.

4.         Mr. Maryak reported on the AAA design. He provided an updated Executive Summary and reviewed it with the committee in detail. Mr. Maryak indicated that 17,630 square feet would be necessary to house the agency. He indicated that there has not yet been resolution on consideration of future space needs for the programs involved in AAA. The sketch shows maximizing the size of the building along Main Street . The building has a footprint of 11,000+ square feet. So, with two stories, the building could hold 22,000+ square feet. However, we need to provide 10 handicapped parking spaces. That means that only 90 parking spaces could be planned on site. There is the potential of 30 parking spaces on the streets. So, there is a potential of 120 parking spaces available. We are in three places for consideration: 1) future growth of the agency; 2) if the space is maximized with the building – who else would be brought in and how would that impact the parking; and 3) parking – which becomes an issue based on agency needs and the practicality of the site.

            Ms. Deloff indicated that she based the 130 parking spaces on – 44 staff on site each day; 79 participants in the daily meal program; additional visitors for recreation and other programs. She has major concerns about the parking. There is street parking available, but she does not know how much of that will be accessible. The future growth of the program is a potential problem for the space being designed. She does not believe that the current design allows for the addition of more programs. Mr. Loomis indicated he has two concerns – one is the primary entry and the exits drives and the fact that traffic will be routed through residential streets and the fact that it is “tight”. Mr. Loomis does not feel that the site is feasible – particularly given the current proposed designed. He is concerned about the primary access off the side streets and who owns that property and he is concerned about whether or not the City will buy in. Mr. Williams stated that the design appears to be a “silk purse” that we are trying to make out of a “sow’s ear”. We are trying to shoehorn something in to a space that will not work for our program. The program is going to expand and this design does not provide for easy additions. Mr. Williams feels we should look at getting out of ownership of the property gracefully and look at building another AAA facility in a different location. Mr. Maryak indicated that this is a tight site and the Director of the program feels uncomfortable with the room provided in the site design. Mr. Williams feels if we can walk way from these, with a party interested in purchase, he feels we should do it. Mrs. Tytler asked if we could look at the property for Mental Health alone and not include the Health Department in the space. We have a critical need for Horizon House space and we are leasing space for Mental Health. Perhaps we could look at this property for Horizon House for a standalone facility as well in this space. Mr. Ross indicated that he feels that South Main Street is prime property and he would like to see it back on the tax rolls. Mr. Willcox reiterated that he would like to see a price set for the property and have it open for consideration.

5.         Mr. Maryak spoke about the COB space plan update. He distributed a report on the Master Space Planning Project and reviewed it in detail with the committee. The primary conclusions were reviewed with the committee. Mr. Maryak indicated that he isn’t certain whether Buildings and Grounds actually belongs in an office building. He feels that Cooperative Extension, Public Health, and the Conflict Attorney could use their current space with a re-design of that space. Mr. Maryak also reviewed the “Personnel Forecast” and the “Summary of Space Projections”. Based on their projections, the need for increased space is now, there is not a projection for a large space increase in the next five years (2013). Mr. Maryak indicated that the real challenge is the building itself and the fact that it used to be a school.

            Mr. Loomis asked if there is any discussion about letting this company to continue to design. Mr. Schrader indicated that the issue that keeps coming up is growth – Carol spoke about program growth, Mr. Maryak spoke of space growth. Mr. Schrader indicated that we are in an economy where we should not be looking at growing – program, space, or otherwise. We should be looking at maintaining, not at expanding. Can we accomplish what we need to accomplish without growing – we need to reconfigure. If we do not locate Mental Health with the Health Department, we lose the economies of scale gained by co-locating. We need to have conversations about what we want to offer and how we do it most cost effectively. Mr. Loomis asked how we do it? Do we work with other committees? Mr. Loomis sees this committee’s role as addressing the needs of the departments. Mr. Schrader indicated that we need to look at “want” versus “need”. We need to adapt and we are not doing that. We need to look at providing services that we can afford to provide. Mr. Loomis reiterated that we need to work back through the other committees and define what we will be providing and then make a decision about what space is actually needed. Mr. Schrader is looking at a proposal with IKON to put all paper records on electronic means thereby eliminating storage requirements. This does not necessarily mean cutting back staff, but it does allow staff to work smarter. We need to accomplish what we are charged to accomplish, not necessarily what we “want” to accomplish. Mr. Williams asked how we get to the point that Mr. Schrader wants us to reach. How does this Legislature put all of this together. How do we discuss it and come together with a “Master Plan” for direction as to where are going with all of this. We as a body need to do what we are supposed to do, which is provide policy oversight. Mr. Schrader indicated that we have a roadmap, called the County Budget . This is stagnate; the budget needs to be dissected within departments and identify who and how we are serving and decide if that is appropriate. We need to look to see if the services we are providing are still timely and what is needed by today’s population; can we provide better services in a more cost-efficient manner. Each jurisdictional committee needs to carefully consider the programs under its oversight. Mr. Schrader would argue that the current AAA program would fit in the designed building. Are we appropriately providing a level of service? Or is there a level of service that we are not providing? Decisions need to be made along those lines. Tough decisions need to be made. Mr. Williams indicated that the entire Legislature needs to meet and have these conversations. Mrs. Price indicated that she and the Majority Leader will work with the Chairman to enact a meeting to hear the entire presentation from beginning to end and then offer an opportunity to ask questions so decisions can be made on programs and space. Mr. Schrader indicated that he believes the only way to sell surplus County property is through auction or sealed bid. He asked Mr. Suben to research this topic. Mrs. Tytler expressed her frustration about the lack of the Guido Summit and other communication opportunities. Mrs. Tytler reminded the members that government is here to serve the population.

            Mr. Maryak indicated that he will meet with the DA to develop the need for that department. There will be a report available for the next committee meeting. The DMV site will be put “on hold” until direction is given by this committee. The COB project will be finished and a final report will be provided. AAA is complete as far as it can be until decisions are made about programs. The report can be directed through the entire Legislature.

            Mr. Schrader thanked Mr. Maryak for the service he has provided to the committee.

Mr. Williams moved to adjourn at 8:59 a.m.; seconded by Mr. Willcox. Meeting adjourned at 8:59 a.m.

Minutes prepared by Ann Homer, Secretary

  BACK