Personnel Meeting Minutes

June 12, 2008 – 8:00 am

DRAFT  MINUTES

 

Present:                      Larry Cornell, Chairman, Tony Piombo, Vice Chairman, Sandy Price, John Troy

Others present:          Scott Schrader , County Administrator; Mark Suben, County Attorney; Annette Barber , Personnel Officer, Betsy Larkin, County Clerk,  Dennis Whitt, County Auditor, Jeremy Boylan, County Historian, Bill Wood, Elections Commissioner, Bob Howe, Elections Commissioner, Elizabeth Maniaci, Secretary, Evan Geibel, Cortland Standard, Eric Mulvihill WXHC

Absent:                       Steve Dafoe, Dan Tagliente

Excused:                       Kathie Wilcox

Mr. Cornell called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.

Mr. Troy moved adoption of the minutes of the May 8, 2008 meeting; seconded by Mr. Piombo.

All members voting in favor; none opposed; minutes approved as printed.

RESOLUTIONS:

1)   Petition the NYS Legislature County Clerk’s Office Adopt County Emblem as County Seal

Moved by Mr. Troy; seconded by Mr. Piombo.

The seal currently in use by the County Clerk needs to be repaired and the County Clerk wants to adopt the County Emblem depicted in the stained glass dome of the County Court House as the new seal. Mr. Suben was in touch with Ms. Larkin and stated she has worked very hard at this change.  He said that it can be done, but it had to be done in the fashion they were currently pursuing.

All in favor; none opposed; motion carried. 

1A)  Authorize Agreement/ Accept Funds Polling Place Access Improvements

Moved by Mr. Troy; seconded by Mr. Piombo

Discussion: 

Mr. Wood explained this money is the money that is interest as the state has not spent HAVA funds.  It is a small amount and it goes into that same pot as the handicapped accessibility.  Ms. Price asked if there were any plans for this money. All applications have been put in and they would see how much is left.  It is an on going process and Mr. Wood said they can only do what fits into the criteria.

Mr. Wood said four new positions needed to be created to train inspectors and the general public on how to use the new machines. Mr. Wood and Mr. Howe discussed the fact that these people need to be able to teach, and be paid enough so that there would not be a great deal of turn over in these positions. Ms. Price asked how long they would be needed for and Mr. Howe said it would be an on going process. As a result of HAVA, people have to be trained once a year especially with the handicapped accessibility part which is very technical.  Mr. Cornell asked if there was money that the County was receiving from the state that will cover this and the response was part of it would.    The cost for the training is about $30,000.   Mr. Howe questioned how these people should be classified and Mr. Schrader stated they would be considered contractors so Mr. Howe would just need to authorize contracts for service.

Mr. Howe talked about the fact that the City of Cortland 7th Ward is looking to have a Special Election on July 1.  On Tuesday, June 17, the City is coming out with a resolution saying they want a Special Election.  Since it is a Special Election, it means the Board of Elections doesn’t really have anything to do with it.  All expenses are the City’s – legals and everything that is involved in it.  The problem is the City Attorney, a person with the State Attorney, and the State Board of Elections supposedly will be talking today, June 12, and according to Municipal Law you need a 30 day cushion.  If they have the Special Election on July 1, there will not be a 30 day notice.    If they wait and go further into July, it violates the 120 days needed prior to the

November Election.   The problem is that the City has come out and said you can have the election on or about – Mr. Howe stated the BOE doesn’t deal in on or about.  That is why they are doing the resolution so as to be specific to a date. If they pick this date, they are then violating the 120 day rule.  If they are dead set on this date, it depends on the Attorney, the  State, and what Mr. Knickerbocker works out. Mr. Howe said if they end up having it, he does not want anyone coming back stating the BOE did anything incorrect or illegal.

Mr. Suben interjected that his concern lies with his client which is the BOE, and his understanding about the General Municipal Law is that it refers to a Governor’s Election.  Mr. Suben’s said that the City is solely responsible for this election and that being the case, if the City asks the County to do this, Mr. Suben believes they should do so.  The County did not have anything to do with calling the election; they would just be serving the City.  Mr. Wood stated they would do what they are asked to do.  Mr. Troy questioned the cost to run a Special Election, and the response was approximately $1200 - $1500.00   The City will incur the cost.  Mr. Wood stated the Town of Harford just had a Special Election.  Mr. Schrader said there was no reason why the County could not forego the payment for the City of Harford as they were already doing it with every other municipality.   Mr. Howe said for the General Elections they were not charging back.  Mr. Schrader said the Legislature set a policy where they are not going to charge them for election services so it would really be up to the Legislature whether we would bill them.  Mr. Troy questioned whether they could charge the municipalities if they wanted to.  Mr. Schrader confirmed they could.   Ms. Price questioned whether they have been charging other municipalities.  Mr. Howe said that they were charging for Special Elections and Mr. Schrader interjected not since the new law was established.  Mr. Howe said that everything they did for Harford was going back to Harford .    Mr. Schrader questioned when that election took place. Mr. Howe said two weeks ago.   Mr. Schrader stated again that the Legislature set a policy not to charge the election costs back to the municipality for the General Election and that there was no reason why the Legislature could not extend that same policy to Special Elections.  Mr. Howe said if you want to expand that, that is fine but as it stands right now Specials Election expenses were paid by the municipality that wanted that Special Election.  Ms. Price asked how much the Election cost to run. Mr. Wood said it was under $500.00 total. Mr. Howe said the ads ran $58.00, and Ms. Larkin noted the hours ran from noon to 8:00 p.m.  

 Mr. Schrader noted two storage options for the new machines coming in depending on when they arrived.  The first location is Employment and Training located on Main Street which has an area of 2200 square ft. in the basement, and the other location is the Wood’s Property pending receipt of keys.

Ms. Price questioned with regards to the Special Elections if in fact they were going to be charging the City and were they going to forgive the bill for the Town of Harford .  She questioned whether this was up for discussion at this time. Mr. Cornell questioned whether there was a need for a motion for a resolution from this committee to send to the Legislature to vote on it.  Mr. Schrader’s response to Mr. Cornell was that a resolution could be done for the next session and they would vote on it.  Mr. Schrader thought that the Legislature needed to clarify the policy.  A question was asked whether they were going to forgive all Election costs or just the General Election.  Ms. Price asked how to go about doing that and whether they did that as a committee or on the floor.  Mr. Schrader said it would start in committee, Ms. Price interjected by saying we do a resolution here then it goes to the floor for discussion and vote.  Mr. Cornell asked if this is time sensitive.  Mr. Schrader did not think it was time sensitive and Mr. Cornell said then they could have resolution drawn up for their July meeting.  Mr. Howe questioned if they do pass this resolution, how is he to proceed with the reimbursement of the Town of Harford .  Mr. Schrader questioned whether they had already paid and Mr. Howe said yes they are paying now.  Mr. Schrader questioned whether they had already written a check and Mr. Howe said not to him personally, and Mr. Wood said to the suppliers.  Mr. Howe questioned how to put a check through with Ms. Sharp or to Mr. Schrader when it says to the Town of Harford “X” amount of dollars for their expense.  Mr. Schrader said this is the inconsistent methodology with running an election.   Mr. Schrader went on to say HAVA was designed to consolidate all the elections activities through the Board of Elections (BOE) office and take care of all the payments to the inspectors.  Mr. Howe interjected that HAVA is for Federal.  But the state adopted a plan to make all the responsibilities fall under the BOE.  Mr. Schrader said the BOE was now responsible for paying the inspectors and maintaining the machines.  Mr. Howe said not according to the Attorney and the State.  There was a great deal of discussion back and forth with regards to this and finally Mr. Schrader said they were our machines and  asked if we were we going to have the Town of  Harford  employ  people to maintain our machines which made no sense.  Mr. Cornell questioned whether we needed to look into this. Mr. Schrader recommended that the legislature adopt a policy to incorporate the cost and management of Special Elections to the BOE so that we could control our machines.

Mr. Howe asked what happens when fire and school districts want to use the voting machines. Mr. Schrader responded by saying no.   They could buy their own machine or use paper ballots and count the ballots.   Mr. Howe agreed that they should use their own machines and ours should only be used for federal, state, and local elections.

Mr. Cornell questioned what we were going to do with the old machines and Mr. Howe said he had people already interested in purchasing them. Mr. Howe said if you had an auction, people would buy them. The old machines cannot be used as the state out laws this. 

Ms. Price questioned the secretary taking minutes if she had received Mr. Schrader’s recommendation that the Legislature adopt a policy to incorporate the cost and management of Special Elections to the BOE so that the County could control their own machines.  This question was acknowledged.   Ms. Price again made the motion to support the recommendation by Mr. Schrader, and Mr. Cornell asked if anyone agreed and wanted to second the motion. There was no response to second.   Mr. Wood and Mr. Troy both thought that the Special Elections should pay their own fees.  Ms. Price again made the motion on Mr. Schrader’s recommendation. Mr. Cornell said there was a motion and wanted to know if any one would second the motion. No one replied.  Ms. Price agreed that the individual municipalities should pay for these elections but on the other hand they were the County’s machines, our responsibility, and we would want to make sure that the people supervising them for elections were trained and would take good care of the machines.   Mr. Wood pointed out that he went to the Town of Harford on the morning of the Election to check and ensure that everything was okay.  This would continue to be normal practice.

Mr. Cornell stated once again, that he heard a motion, but there was no second.

2)  Extend Temporary Appointment of Information Processing Clerk County Historian

Moved by Mr. Troy; seconded by Mr. Piombo

Discussion:

Mr. Boylan, the County Historian said over a year ago he received a local government grant to catalogue all the records at the records center.  Everything at the records center was held in binders and paper.   As a result, the position of Information Processing Clerk was created to help at the Records Center .  

The grant money will run out on June 30th and there is about one more month of work left to do of complete cataloguing.  Mr. Boylan praised the processing clerk’s work and said she had done an exceptional job.  She had inventoried and entered into the database more than 2000 boxes and had indexed 22,000 files which included Health, DSS and Personnel files. As a result, when anyone is looking for a record, rather than going to a binder when a request is sent over, they can just type in a name and pull the file.  Unfortunately, the grant money is going to run out and Mr. Boylan is looking to extend her position for one additional month.

Mr. Schrader asked when the next application was due and Mr. Boylan said February was the deadline.  Mr. Boylan did not write a grant through the Historian’s office this year because he was busy completing this one. He did not want to write a grant for just one month. Mr. Schrader questioned him because he was thinking about the program they were trying to develop with ICON for $123,000 regarding electronic record maintenance.   Mr. Boylan thought the maximum they could get as a County was $75,000 unless it is a Cooperative which the Records Center may fall under, but not the County.  Ms. Price said someone commented to her from B&G the other day that if the County managed their records better, there would not be a storage issue. Mr. Boylan said there are other grants out there to look into for the ICON program and he mentioned the LGRMIF as an option. Even if one were to apply for the maximum amount which he thought was $75,000 it could definitely go towards it.   

All in favor; none opposed; passed.

3)      Authorization to Contract with ASC Dining Services County Historian

Moved by Mr. Troy; seconded by Mr. Piombo

Discussion:

Mr. Cornell asked Mr. Boylan if he requested bids and was ASC the only one that came in. Mr. Boylan said they received two bids.  With all things compared between the two bids i.e. table linens, glassware versus plastic etc, Mr. Boylan felt that ASC put together a more beneficial package than M&D. In answer to the question posed as to whether they were going to be serving “finger food” or not, Mr. Boylan said it was going to be a full buffet with open bar.  Mr. Schrader was given a copy of the menu and more could be made available if needed. Mr. Boylan recently attended a dinner prepared by ASC at the Alumni House for about 250 people and they did a nice job.  This benefit will be for 300 - 350 people.  Ms. Price questioned whether this will bring in revenue and Mr. Boylan said yes.  He said that when they put the budget together for the Historians Budget they included this money for this cost and the tickets will off set the cost.  Ms. Price questioned if there will be enough to cover the expenses.  Mr. Boylan said the ticket price will cover this, off set not only the contract for ASC, but will off set potentially some other costs as well such as tent rental.  In response to the question as to what the ticket price will be Jeremy said it will run approximately $125 - $150 per couple which is in range of other events similar to this such as the hospital fund raiser.  Mr. Boylan felt this would be a sell out.

All in favor; none opposed; passed.
Ms. Larkin  apologized for being late and wondered if there were any questions she could address regarding the new County Emblem; however, Mr. Cornell said that he had already taken care of the description and related questions.

Mr. Whitt commented on behalf of the Chairman of the Legislature.  Mr. Whitt praised Mr. Boylan and Ms. Larkin on the hard work they did regarding the County Emblem , and said the County Historian had been working on it since he had been with the County and the County Clerk for as long as he himself had been with the County.  The Historian and Clerk diligently worked at writing letters and finally found the original rendition from approximately 1923 from Texas .  What they see on most of the publications are newer editions of the original logo. It is not really known where this was drawn from whether from the door knobs at the court house or ceiling.  However, what they did find was an original rendition by the original architect that was on file in Texas . The Chairman thought that if this passes and it did, then he thought that a similar rendition could be used as a Seal for the County Legislature which can be done by Resolution. Mr. Whitt said the Chairman asked him and Mr. Boylan to do some work on this and then report back to him.    The Chairman would like to put this same Seal – a larger version; however, in Chambers.  Mr. Whitt said the Chairman will be making a proposal at the June meeting to adopt a similar rendition to be used by the Legislature which can be done by resolution and to go ahead and get approval to purchase a large logo as seen used by other Counties. Mr. Whitt again recognized the accomplishment of Mr. Boylan and Ms. Larkin.

Ms. Larkin pointed out that when they did the Seal for the Court House it was already digitized so they did not have to go to the added expense of having this done again.  If the Legislature wants to use this digitized image it will be made available to them.

Mr. Cornell moved on to Personnel and asked Ms. Barber if she had anything for discussion.

Ms. Barber discussed the vacancy report.  She noted tests recently completed impacted four vacancies.  The Department Heads wanted to wait for the results from the exams to avoid provisional situations. Ms. Barber anticipates the results from these exams soon so some of the vacancies-- Volunteer Coordinator Office Manager will be taken care of and recent results on the Medical Services Clerk will take care of those four vacancies. The summer people have been hired at the Highway Department --wade pool attendants, park attendants, and seasonal aides.  Ms. Barber said that she, Mr. O’Mara, and Mr. Schrader will be talking with regards to the Accountant position and all else was good.

Mr. Cornell asked if anyone had any comments or questions and Ms. Price wanted to extend her compliments to the Personnel Department with regards to Ms. Barber, the Personnel Officer and Laurie Gosse, the Deputy Personnel Officer.  Ms. Price said she served on two contract negotiations at TC3 and Ms. Barber and Ms. Gosse have been working diligently on them and they have been representing Cortland County very well. Ms. Barber and Ms. Gosse did the County proud.

 4)  Adopt Local Law No. 1 for the year 2008 A Local Law Restating the Establishment of A Plan of Mutual Self-Self Insurance for Worker’s Compensation

Moved by Mr. Troy; seconded by Mr. Piombo

Discussion:

Ms. Price said this is a very important issue to all Towns but specifically for the Town of   Harford .  Their financial costs regarding Worker’s Compensation are very difficult at this time.  Ms. Price supports this agenda it but is concerned with section 2 which changes the responsibility from a “Compensation Insurance Committee” to the County Administrator . Ms. Price was concerned that the County Administrator is very busy as it is.  Ms. Price questioned whether he should be burdened with additional responsibility.  Mr. Cornell questioned Mr. Schrader as to whether he had been handling this already.  Mr. Schrader said yes he had been.  Mr. Schrader said the provision in section 2 had been created back in 1956 and had not been followed since approximately the mid 80’s. There has not been a “Compensation Committee” at all.  Ms. Price questioned its existence. Mr. Schrader said it does not exist. Ms. Price questioned how it has been handled.  Mr. Schrader said he could only comment on this issue since he has been with the County.   Prior to the time that he had been taking care of this function, he thought it was handled by the County Attorney ’s office. Ms. Price stated concern that the County had not been following their own laws and wondered what else they may not be following.  Ms. Price now makes the statement and poses the question as to whether the committee now wants to follow the new and current rules they have already been following. Mr. Schrader stated it is a policy decision. Mr. Piombo confirmed with Mr. Schrader that he is currently handling this position and whether or not he feels that he can continue to perform the functions with his current work load. Mr. Schrader said yes. Mr. Piombo questioned Ms. Price if she was happy with what Mr. Schrader was doing. Ms. Price said she did not realize he had been performing these functions. Mr. Piombo again asked now that she knew he was handling this function, was she happy with the job he is performing. She again was concerned that he was too busy having to handle that as well as dealing with County Budgets and everything else.  Mr. Piombo questioned Ms. Price and asked if she thought that the County Administrator will have too much “power”.  She said yes. Mr. Piombo questioned whether she felt the issue could wait and she said she did not feel the Town of Harford could afford to wait.   Mr. Cornell questioned Mr. Suben if they passed this today and found out later they wanted to change it could it be changed by resolution. Mr. Suben said it cannot.  Ms. Price said this was a local law, Mr. Troy interjected it could be changed by another local law.  Mr. Schrader said it could be changed if it became an issue. Mr. Troy questioned that the changes would make what they were now doing as current practice. Mr. Schrader said the changes were making it legal as to the way they were currently operating. Mr. Suben said he just recently saw this document the other day and his office is going to do an analysis to see if what they are trying to do is legal. Ms. Price questioned how long it would take Mr. Suben, and Mr. Suben said he would make it a priority and to try to have it done before the Legislative Session.

 Mr. Suben is aware of the need for the Town of Harford to have this issue taken care of and although he does not feel anything is wrong with it, he just reserves the right to look into it further. Mr. Suben said that if nobody challenges this, they should be fine and can proceed, however, if  there is an impediment in the Municipal Home Room Law and we don’t have the power to do this because it is a state wide general law, he just wants to look at that and see that they are all informed. Mr. Suben said that if they want, as far as a policy matter, to go ahead and enact subject to what he may discover whether it is lawful for them to do this or not, he suggested they pass it as he did not want to stand in their way or hold it up. However, he has to still see if this can be done.  The fact that they have been practicing this for so long does not mean they can change it. 

Ms. Price questioned whether Mr. Troy was calling a joint meeting next Tuesday with Personnel Committee and if they are Ms. Price asked Mr. Suben if he would have his determination by then. Mr. Suben said he would try to have an answer for them. Mr. Cornell said they would have to advertise this for a Public Hearing and questioned whether this would give them enough time.  Ms. Price confirmed yes to the advertisement and Ms. Morgan, Clerk of the Legislature, said the Cortland Standard needed three days notice. Ms. Morgan said if it passed, she could put it in Monday and that would give them their 3 days. She mentioned they also have the Public Hearing for the TC3 budget at the same time. Ms. Price questioned if they pass this as written today and Mr. Suben looks at it and decides it can’t be done this way or if we decide to do different, can it be advertised one way and then amended.  Mr. Suben said it has to be advertised as it is going to be considered. Mr. Cornell questioned whether they should hold off and wait till March and advertise this.  Mr. Troy asked do you recommend that we pass it today pending your review.  Mr. Suben said only for their convenience so that would not have to call a Special Meeting  Ms. Price said there will be a Special  Meeting Tuesday, but they are told by Ms. Morgan it has to go to the press Monday. Ms. Morgan interjected that she could put the ad in and then withdraw it if need be.  Mr. Schrader said that if they pass it today and then there is an issue with it, he could pull it. Mr. Schrader said that the County Attorney ’s office will find no issue with this. Mr. Schrader said there is a presumption that the laws are legal until determined otherwise by a court of competent jurisdiction.  That won’t even become an issue because this is legal. Mr. Schrader said it  has been done in 50 other counties,  as it relates to the apportionment and assessments, as far as who manages your worker’s Compensation plan, that is a Local decision  the State does not impose any requirements on that. The County Attorney ’s office will find nothing wrong with this.  Mr. Suben just noted he wants an opportunity to review it.  Mr.  Cornell questioned Ms. Price as to how fast she wanted this and she questioned how long the Town of Harford could wait on this whether it was September or October. She stated that she realized it was better sooner than later as far as the Town of Harford was concerned. Mr. Schrader confirmed that as soon as possible is better.  Ms. Price thought that developing their budget in September would be the biggest issue. Mr. Schrader needs to notify the Towns Cities and Villages by Sept. 1 of the estimated assessment for each municipality.  Ms. Price knows that Mr. Schrader needs time to develop those so that cannot be done the last minute. In addition, Mr. Schrader said this law won’t take affect till it is filed with the Secretary of State and there needs to be public notification of its adoption. Mr. Schrader said if the Committee approves this, it then goes to finance, and if finance approves it, they will put it on the Legislature’s desk on Wednesday and it will meet the 7 day requirements by the time they have the public notice of its adoption and it is filed with the Secretary of State.  Then, they would then be looking at possibly another month which would be the end of July. Ms. Price stated that this would then begin a busy time for Mr. Schrader as this is budget time. Mr. Schrader said that is when he works with McNeil’s on calculations and formulas to determine what the assessments have to be. Mr. Schrader said he would like to see this passed today, so it could be forwarded to Budget and Finance.

Mr. Cornell said this is not only important for the Town of Harford but for all Towns. Mr. Cornell said he would like to see this go through as it could be a devastating issue for any Town to go through.

All in favor; none opposed, passed.

Ms. Price said she had one change she would like to make to the Rule and that was on page 2 Section 4 of the Plan where it says Clerk of  the County Legislation , … Ms. Price wants that changed to… Clerk of the Legislature….   

Mr. Cornell addressed Mr. Troy so he could comment on the code of ethics. 

Discussion:

Mr. Troy was hoping to have a code of ethics document today; however, they are just adding the final touches to it. Mr. Troy handed out a report from the Ethics Subcommittee and it basically has dates and times.  They presented the preliminary document to the committee at the March meeting.  There were three areas of concerns outlined in the handout that was given to all members. Mr. Troy stated on May 28 the Sub Committee met, he thanked Mr. Don Spaulding for attending and giving his input. They looked at the Code of Ethics and basically decided to go with the same Code they provided as a preliminary.  The three areas they decided to go with were the Appendix, which was the regular state disclosure form.  Initially a lot of people felt this was true intrusive, there was disclosure on families, children, and wives. So, Mr. Suben provided a form used at Cayuga County and they expanded on that by adding some room for comments and will present that as the new disclosure form.  They are aware that a lot of people such as Mr. Whitt, Mr. Daniels and Mr. Schrader who have to fill out the State Disclosure Form and they are going to present the new Appendix A for people who don’t have to do the State.  It is an alternative form.

The second area is Article 3 Section C1.  This section prohibits anyone who was a County Officer to run for County Office . Mr. Troy said that Mr.Suben pointed out this was written improperly.  It actually prohibited a Legislator from running again for Legislature.  This will be reworded to say a Department Head is not going to be able to run for Legislature. This was discussed at the special meeting and it was a definite disagreement as to whether that should be included and the committee felt that it should be included. So they will move forward with the new document.

The third area Article 3 Section C4 Prohibits the Party Chairman from being Election Commissioner. Mr. Troy and Mr. McKee do not really endorse this but they felt it should be brought forth so that it would not appear they were hiding the issue

Mr. Troy said Mr. Schrader should be providing the Legislature with a copy of the new Code.  It is basically the same thing with Appendix A different and the one section reworded and the Election Commissioner the same. Hopefully this will be brought to Committee for action and then to the legislature in July.

Mr. Suben commented that he has not seen the draft but he did not believe there would be any problem advising him on the particular section involving County Officers running for County Office . However if there is anything in there that is going to be debated involving a County Attorney for example running for DA then he would not be able to advise on that issue.  Mr. Troy felt that it was regarding strictly legislature.

Mr. Whitt talked about his experience the last time the Legislature met to discuss this type of issue and in several conversations he had with Legislators and the Mayor, one of the things they thought would be useful is for someone to give a speech letting people know the proposal is  not a choice by any particular individual or Legislator. They were only presenting options and the fact that anybody has participated drafting any particular section does not imply they advocate that section. It is however the job of the appointed officials to draft up the options required.

Secondly, Mr. Whitt continues to say the fact that you want to legislate or prohibit activities in the future does not make it evil or wrong in the past.  The fact is the way it stands right now, all the things that seem to be adjusted right here are not prohibited right now.  We have an opinion and don’t have to follow the disclosure form.   Therefore, there is no ethical issue involved.

Next, running for office--there is no prohibition to do this.  It simply is not wrong, unethical or illegal. The issue is do they want to do that. For those that participated in that it needs to be clear that some people thought we were advocating a position and that was not the case.  For example the Party Chairs became a big issue.  Nobody advocates this.  Mr. Whitt stated they just have a duty to inform the people that according to the law enforcement official in NY you can prohibit that activity by virtual of the November Opinion that was issued last year.   Mr. Whitt says that if the Legislature hears this and a report is done letting them knows that they have these as options, it is not declaring anything inappropriate in the past. Again, it is just an option to make that decision.  Mr. Whitt wanted to clarify that that was all his role ever was.  Mr. Whitt said he had a couple of Legislators approach him and they thought he had a personal agenda and he stated he did not. Mr. Whitt felt this needed to be reported to the full Legislature so they do not think they are doing business with anybody else.

Mr. Troy felt that Mr. Whitt explained what he attempted to explain very well.

Mr. Cornell stated that this should then be brought to the next committee so they can take action and get it behind them.  There were more important things to address and move on with. He said constituents wanted to know why they were wasting so much time with this Code of Ethics when there were other things to be addressed.  

Mr. Cornell asked what the status was with the DMV land and if Mr. Schrader had heard from Mr. Armideo.  Mr. Schrader had not. The last contract they had with Mr. Armideo called for a closing by July 1st, and they are currently waiting for the environmental impact statement and the Environmental Phase I Inspection that Mr. Armideo was responsible for. Mr. Schrader has not received that information and has not had any conversations with Mr. Armideo in a couple of weeks. Mr. Schrader spoke to the Assistant County Attorney handling this and she was going to contact Mr. Armideo’s attorney to see where they stood.

Mr. Troy stated that on Tuesday, the Budget and Finance committee will be meeting and President Haynes from TC3 will be there. Discussion will begin with the Budget Presentation and then at the end of that they will move into Executive Session to discuss contract negotiations.  Mr. Troy said they would like the members of Personnel who can attend to be present.  Mr. Troy questioned if this had to take action for this to be a Joint Meeting and Mr. Schrader said he felt it would be better if they did take action.  Mr. Troy then asked to have a Special Meeting to be called and then after the Executive Session they could take action on the contract and then go on with the rest of the meeting.  Mr. Cornell questioned the time and Mr. Troy said it was at 8:00 o’clock. on Tuesday.  Mr. Cornell said they would call a special Personnel Committee Meeting and make it the same time as the Joint Meeting. Mr. Cornell confirmed this with Ms. Morgan and she stated that Budget and Finance would proceed from that point.

Motion to adjourn made by Mr. Troy; seconded by Mr. Piombo, meeting was adjourned at 10:02 a.m.

 BACK